6a8582e54d
- Add Cloud for Sovereignty landing zone architecture and deployment - Implement complete legal document management system - Reorganize documentation with improved navigation - Add infrastructure improvements (Dockerfiles, K8s, monitoring) - Add operational improvements (graceful shutdown, rate limiting, caching) - Create comprehensive project structure documentation - Add Azure deployment automation scripts - Improve repository navigation and organization
201 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
201 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Security Audit Checklist
|
|
|
|
This document provides a comprehensive security audit checklist for The Order monorepo.
|
|
|
|
## Authentication & Authorization
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All API endpoints require authentication
|
|
- [ ] JWT tokens are properly validated and signed
|
|
- [ ] DID signatures are cryptographically verified
|
|
- [ ] eIDAS certificates are validated with proper chain of trust
|
|
- [ ] Role-based access control (RBAC) is enforced
|
|
- [ ] Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is supported where required
|
|
- [ ] Session management is secure (timeouts, invalidation)
|
|
- [ ] Password policies are enforced (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] API keys are stored securely and rotated regularly
|
|
- [ ] OAuth2/OIDC flows are implemented correctly
|
|
|
|
## Secrets Management
|
|
|
|
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets in code
|
|
- [ ] Secrets are stored in AWS Secrets Manager or Azure Key Vault
|
|
- [ ] Secrets are rotated regularly
|
|
- [ ] Secret access is logged and audited
|
|
- [ ] Secrets are encrypted at rest and in transit
|
|
- [ ] Environment variables are validated and sanitized
|
|
- [ ] Secret caching has appropriate TTL
|
|
- [ ] Secrets are never logged or exposed in error messages
|
|
|
|
## Data Protection
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Sensitive data is encrypted at rest
|
|
- [ ] Data is encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+)
|
|
- [ ] PII is properly handled and protected
|
|
- [ ] Data retention policies are enforced
|
|
- [ ] Data deletion is secure and audited
|
|
- [ ] Database connections use SSL/TLS
|
|
- [ ] Database credentials are stored securely
|
|
- [ ] Backup encryption is enabled
|
|
- [ ] Data masking is used in non-production environments
|
|
|
|
## Input Validation & Sanitization
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All user inputs are validated
|
|
- [ ] SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
|
|
- [ ] NoSQL injection prevention
|
|
- [ ] XSS prevention (output encoding)
|
|
- [ ] CSRF protection is enabled
|
|
- [ ] File upload validation (type, size, content)
|
|
- [ ] Path traversal prevention
|
|
- [ ] Command injection prevention
|
|
- [ ] XML/XXE injection prevention
|
|
- [ ] LDAP injection prevention
|
|
|
|
## API Security
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Rate limiting is implemented
|
|
- [ ] API versioning is used
|
|
- [ ] CORS is properly configured
|
|
- [ ] API authentication is required
|
|
- [ ] Request size limits are enforced
|
|
- [ ] Response compression is secure
|
|
- [ ] API keys are rotated regularly
|
|
- [ ] API endpoints are documented
|
|
- [ ] API errors don't leak sensitive information
|
|
- [ ] Request/response logging doesn't expose secrets
|
|
|
|
## Cryptography
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Strong encryption algorithms are used (AES-256, RSA-2048+)
|
|
- [ ] Cryptographic keys are managed securely (KMS/HSM)
|
|
- [ ] Key rotation is implemented
|
|
- [ ] Cryptographic randomness is secure
|
|
- [ ] Hash functions are secure (SHA-256+)
|
|
- [ ] Digital signatures are properly validated
|
|
- [ ] Certificate validation is comprehensive
|
|
- [ ] TLS configuration is secure (strong ciphers, protocols)
|
|
|
|
## Infrastructure Security
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Container images are scanned for vulnerabilities
|
|
- [ ] Container images are signed (Cosign)
|
|
- [ ] SBOM is generated for all artifacts
|
|
- [ ] Infrastructure as Code is reviewed
|
|
- [ ] Network policies are enforced
|
|
- [ ] Firewall rules are properly configured
|
|
- [ ] Load balancers have DDoS protection
|
|
- [ ] WAF rules are configured
|
|
- [ ] Secrets are not exposed in infrastructure configs
|
|
- [ ] Resource limits are enforced
|
|
|
|
## Dependency Management
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Dependencies are regularly updated
|
|
- [ ] Vulnerable dependencies are identified and patched
|
|
- [ ] Dependency scanning is automated (Grype, Trivy)
|
|
- [ ] License compliance is checked
|
|
- [ ] Unused dependencies are removed
|
|
- [ ] Dependency pinning is used where appropriate
|
|
- [ ] Supply chain security is monitored
|
|
|
|
## Logging & Monitoring
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Security events are logged
|
|
- [ ] Logs are stored securely
|
|
- [ ] Log retention policies are enforced
|
|
- [ ] Sensitive data is not logged
|
|
- [ ] Log access is restricted and audited
|
|
- [ ] Security monitoring and alerting is configured
|
|
- [ ] Incident response procedures are documented
|
|
- [ ] Security metrics are tracked
|
|
|
|
## Compliance
|
|
|
|
- [ ] GDPR compliance (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] eIDAS compliance
|
|
- [ ] ISO 27001 alignment (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] SOC 2 compliance (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] Regulatory requirements are met
|
|
- [ ] Privacy policies are up to date
|
|
- [ ] Data processing agreements are in place
|
|
- [ ] Compliance audits are conducted regularly
|
|
|
|
## Threat Modeling
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Threat model is documented
|
|
- [ ] Attack surfaces are identified
|
|
- [ ] Threat vectors are analyzed
|
|
- [ ] Mitigation strategies are implemented
|
|
- [ ] Threat model is reviewed regularly
|
|
- [ ] New features are threat modeled
|
|
- [ ] Third-party integrations are assessed
|
|
|
|
## Security Testing
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Penetration testing is conducted regularly
|
|
- [ ] Vulnerability scanning is automated
|
|
- [ ] Security code review is performed
|
|
- [ ] Fuzzing is used for critical components
|
|
- [ ] Security regression tests are in place
|
|
- [ ] Bug bounty program is considered
|
|
- [ ] Security testing is part of CI/CD
|
|
|
|
## Incident Response
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Incident response plan is documented
|
|
- [ ] Security contacts are identified
|
|
- [ ] Incident response team is trained
|
|
- [ ] Communication plan is in place
|
|
- [ ] Forensics capabilities are available
|
|
- [ ] Recovery procedures are documented
|
|
- [ ] Post-incident review process exists
|
|
|
|
## Security Training
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Security training is provided to developers
|
|
- [ ] Security awareness program exists
|
|
- [ ] Secure coding guidelines are followed
|
|
- [ ] Security best practices are documented
|
|
- [ ] Security updates are communicated
|
|
|
|
## Review Schedule
|
|
|
|
- **Monthly**: Dependency updates, security patches
|
|
- **Quarterly**: Security audit, threat model review
|
|
- **Annually**: Penetration testing, compliance audit
|
|
- **As needed**: Security incidents, new features, major changes
|
|
|
|
## Tools & Resources
|
|
|
|
### Automated Scanning
|
|
- **Trivy**: Container and filesystem scanning
|
|
- **Grype**: Dependency vulnerability scanning
|
|
- **Syft**: SBOM generation
|
|
- **ESLint Security Plugin**: Static code analysis
|
|
- **SonarQube**: Code quality and security
|
|
|
|
### Manual Testing
|
|
- **OWASP ZAP**: Web application security testing
|
|
- **Burp Suite**: Web security testing
|
|
- **Nmap**: Network scanning
|
|
- **Metasploit**: Penetration testing
|
|
|
|
### Resources
|
|
- [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
|
|
- [OWASP API Security Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-api-security/)
|
|
- [CWE Top 25](https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/)
|
|
- [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
|
|
|
|
## Sign-off
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Security audit completed
|
|
- [ ] Findings documented
|
|
- [ ] Remediation plan created
|
|
- [ ] Timeline established
|
|
- [ ] Stakeholders notified
|
|
|
|
**Audit Date**: _______________
|
|
**Auditor**: _______________
|
|
**Next Review Date**: _______________
|
|
|