7ac74f432b
- Institutional / JVMTM / reserve-provenance / GRU transport + standards JSON - Validation and verify scripts (Blockscout labels, x402, GRU preflight, P1 local path) - Wormhole wiring in AGENTS, MCP_SETUP, MASTER_INDEX, 04-configuration README - Meta docs, integration gaps, live verification log, architecture updates - CI validate-config workflow updates Operator/LAN items, submodule working trees, and public token-aggregation edge routes remain follow-up (see TODOS_CONSOLIDATED P1). Made-with: Cursor
291 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
291 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
# GRU M1 Master Implementation, Testing & Dry-Run Plan
|
|
|
|
**Last Updated:** 2026-03-31
|
|
**Document Version:** 1.1
|
|
**Status:** Active Documentation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Executive Objective
|
|
|
|
This master plan defines the **end-to-end implementation, testing, and dry-run simulation framework** for launching and validating **GRU M1 compliant settlement instruments (`cISO(C/T)`)** and their **public listings on CoinMarketCap (CMC) and CoinGecko (CG)**.
|
|
|
|
The plan is designed to:
|
|
|
|
* Ensure successful third-party listing approval
|
|
* Validate data integrity under real-world market conditions
|
|
* Prevent misclassification, delays, or red flags
|
|
* Produce auditable evidence suitable for institutional, banking, and sovereign review
|
|
|
|
This document assumes:
|
|
|
|
* **All `cISO(C/T)` instruments are GRU M1**
|
|
* **Canonical Chain 138 `c*` assets and public-network `cW*` mirrors are both GRU M1, with `cW*` acting as the transport form of canonical M1**
|
|
* **All are externally classified as stablecoins / fiat-pegged assets**
|
|
* **CMC/CG methodology is authoritative for public market representation**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase I - Canonical Definition & Governance Lock
|
|
|
|
### 1.1 Naming & Symbol Registry (Authoritative)
|
|
|
|
Establish and freeze the canonical naming standard:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Symbol: c + ISO-4217 + (C | T)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
* cUSDC - Compliant USD Coin
|
|
* cUSDT - Compliant USD Token
|
|
* cEURC - Compliant EUR Coin
|
|
|
|
**Governance Lock:**
|
|
|
|
* No symbol changes post-submission
|
|
* One ISO code = one unit of account
|
|
* `c` explicitly denotes *compliance*, not wrapping
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Symbol registry table
|
|
* Naming rationale memo (1 page)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 1.2 External Classification Mapping (CMC/CG-Facing)
|
|
|
|
| Internal Reality | External Representation |
|
|
| ---------------- | ------------------------ |
|
|
| GRU M1 | Stablecoin / Fiat-Pegged |
|
|
| Coin (C) | Native coin |
|
|
| Token (T) | Contract token |
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
|
|
* Never reference GRU layers in listing forms
|
|
* Never claim reserve status or dominance exemption
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* External classification matrix
|
|
* Reviewer-safe terminology glossary
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase II - Issuance Architecture & Supply Controls
|
|
|
|
### 2.1 Mint/Burn & Supply Disclosure
|
|
|
|
Define and document:
|
|
|
|
* Mint authority
|
|
* Burn authority
|
|
* Reserve backing logic
|
|
* Circulating vs non-circulating supply
|
|
|
|
Required fields (CMC/CG):
|
|
|
|
* Circulating supply
|
|
* Total supply
|
|
* Max supply (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Supply mechanics diagram
|
|
* Mint/burn policy
|
|
* Reserve attestation summary
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 2.2 Price & Peg Integrity Model
|
|
|
|
Peg assumptions:
|
|
|
|
* Target price = 1.0000 (unit of account)
|
|
* Allowed variance band defined
|
|
|
|
Controls:
|
|
|
|
* Redemption mechanism
|
|
* Market-making logic (if any)
|
|
* Emergency peg defense policy
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Peg maintenance memo
|
|
* Stress scenarios
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase III - CMC & CoinGecko Listing Preparation
|
|
|
|
### 3.1 Listing Application Package
|
|
|
|
Prepare **separate but aligned** applications for CMC and CG:
|
|
|
|
Core components:
|
|
|
|
* Project description (reviewer-safe)
|
|
* Explorer links
|
|
* Contract / chain data
|
|
* Supply verification documentation
|
|
* Contact & legal entity info
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* CMC application draft
|
|
* CoinGecko application draft
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 3.2 Red-Flag Avoidance Checklist
|
|
|
|
Explicitly avoid:
|
|
|
|
* "Algorithmic stablecoin" language
|
|
* Yield or rebasing claims
|
|
* Synthetic or derivative framing
|
|
|
|
Required language:
|
|
|
|
* "Fiat-referenced settlement instrument"
|
|
* "Mint-and-burn against reserves"
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Red-flag checklist
|
|
* Approved description text
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase IV - Pre-Listing Simulation & Dry-Runs
|
|
|
|
### 4.1 Internal Sandbox Environment
|
|
|
|
Simulate:
|
|
|
|
* Mint events
|
|
* Burn events
|
|
* Transfers
|
|
* Explorer indexing
|
|
* Supply updates
|
|
|
|
Metrics monitored:
|
|
|
|
* Supply consistency
|
|
* Explorer lag
|
|
* Indexer visibility
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Sandbox logs
|
|
* Supply reconciliation report
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 4.2 Market Data Simulation (Real-World Feeds)
|
|
|
|
Use live market data to simulate:
|
|
|
|
* Stablecoin dominance impact
|
|
* Total market cap inclusion
|
|
* BTC/ETH dominance shifts
|
|
|
|
Scenarios:
|
|
|
|
* Normal market
|
|
* High volatility
|
|
* Stablecoin expansion
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Dominance impact model
|
|
* Time-series charts
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase V - Post-Listing Monitoring & Validation
|
|
|
|
### 5.1 Live Data Verification (T+1 / T+7 / T+30)
|
|
|
|
Check:
|
|
|
|
* Price correctness
|
|
* Supply correctness
|
|
* Category tagging
|
|
* Market cap calculation
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Verification checklists
|
|
* Screenshot evidence
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 5.2 Incident Response Playbook
|
|
|
|
Triggers:
|
|
|
|
* Peg deviation
|
|
* Supply mismatch
|
|
* Misclassification
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
|
|
* Immediate disclosure
|
|
* Indexer communication
|
|
* Corrective data submission
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
* Incident response SOP
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase VI - Audit, Reporting & Institutional Readiness
|
|
|
|
### 6.1 Audit-Ready Artifacts
|
|
|
|
Produce:
|
|
|
|
* Full methodology
|
|
* Supply attestation history
|
|
* Listing correspondence
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 6.2 Optional Enhancements
|
|
|
|
* Ex-M1 dominance dashboards
|
|
* Internal GRU balance sheet views
|
|
* Regulator-ready disclosure packs
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Final Readiness Gate (Go / No-Go)
|
|
|
|
Launch proceeds only if:
|
|
|
|
* All dry-runs pass
|
|
* No unresolved red flags
|
|
* CMC & CG reviewers confirm understanding
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Related Documentation
|
|
|
|
* [GRU M1 Real-Data Dominance Addendum](GRU_M1_REAL_DATA_DOMINANCE_ADDENDUM.md)
|
|
* [GRU M1 Listing Dry-Run Runbook](../runbooks/GRU_M1_LISTING_DRY_RUN_RUNBOOK.md)
|
|
* [CoinGecko Submission Guide](../04-configuration/coingecko/COINGECKO_SUBMISSION_GUIDE.md)
|
|
* [Chain 138 Token Addresses](../11-references/CHAIN138_TOKEN_ADDRESSES.md)
|
|
* [CMC & CoinGecko Reporting](../../smom-dbis-138/services/token-aggregation/docs/CMC_COINGECKO_REPORTING.md)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Closing Statement
|
|
|
|
This master plan ensures that **GRU M1 instruments are launched, listed, and monitored with the same rigor applied to institutional payment rails**, while remaining fully compatible with public crypto market data platforms.
|