proxmox/docs/11-references/EXPLORER_TRANSACTION_COMPLIANCE_MATRIX.md

Explorer Transaction Compliance Matrix

Purpose: define the first explorer-side heuristic for grading how well a transaction is evidenced, decoded, and aligned with the repo's GRU, x402, and ISO-20022 posture.

This matrix is intentionally operational and observational. It is not a legal opinion, regulatory ruling, or substitute for off-chain compliance controls.

Scope

Use this score to:

• triage transactions in the explorer
• understand how much structured evidence is visible
• highlight transactions that deserve deeper human review

Do not use this score as:

• final regulatory approval
• final settlement approval
• a substitute for policy-engine, KYC, AML, or ledger review

Score

Total: 100

1. Execution Integrity

Weight: 25

Signals:

• success vs failure
• presence of mined execution context
• overall confidence that the transaction actually completed as intended

2. Decode Clarity

Weight: 15

Signals:

• method label is known
• decoded input parameters are visible
• explorer can show structured intent rather than raw calldata only

3. Counterparty Traceability

Weight: 15

Signals:

• sender visible
• recipient or created contract visible
• block anchoring visible
• timestamp visible

4. Asset Posture

Weight: 20

Signals:

• transferred assets appear GRU-aware
• transferred assets appear x402-ready where relevant
• transferred assets appear ISO-20022-aligned in the local explorer posture

Notes:

• this is neutral rather than punitive for transactions that do not include token transfers
• this is an explorer-side view based on local GRU intelligence, not a final institutional judgment

5. Audit Richness

Weight: 15

Signals:

• token transfers indexed
• internal calls visible
• raw input visible
• decoded input visible

6. Exception Hygiene

Weight: 10

Signals:

• explicit revert reason
• failed execution
• obvious exception posture that lowers confidence

Grades

• A: 90-100
• B: 80-89
• C: 70-79
• D: 60-69
• E: <60

Interpretation

• A means the explorer has strong structured evidence and the transaction is easy to review operationally.
• B means the transaction is still strong, but some context is missing.
• C means the transaction is understandable but not richly evidenced.
• D means review confidence is thin.
• E means the explorer-visible posture is weak and deserves caution.

Current Limitations

• The matrix does not ingest off-chain policy decisions.
• The matrix does not prove legal or regulatory sufficiency.
• The matrix does not parse full ISO-20022 payloads.
• The matrix depends on explorer indexing quality and local GRU intelligence coverage.

Next Upgrades

• add log-level standards and event scoring
• add ISO correlation identifiers when available
• add bridge-lane and cross-chain settlement evidence
• add reserve and governance posture where directly linked to tx context