Files
proxmox/docs/archive/status/ETHERSCAN_VERIFICATION_STATUS.md
defiQUG cb47cce074 Complete markdown files cleanup and organization
- Organized 252 files across project
- Root directory: 187 → 2 files (98.9% reduction)
- Moved configuration guides to docs/04-configuration/
- Moved troubleshooting guides to docs/09-troubleshooting/
- Moved quick start guides to docs/01-getting-started/
- Moved reports to reports/ directory
- Archived temporary files
- Generated comprehensive reports and documentation
- Created maintenance scripts and guides

All files organized according to established standards.
2026-01-06 01:46:25 -08:00

148 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown

# Etherscan Verification Status
**Date**: $(date)
**Contract**: `0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2`
**Status**: ⚠️ **VERIFICATION ATTEMPTED - BYTECODE MISMATCH**
---
## ✅ Contract Details
- **Address**: `0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2`
- **Name**: `CCIPWETH9Bridge`
- **Network**: Ethereum Mainnet
- **Source**: `contracts/ccip/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol`
- **Status on Mainnet**: ✅ Contract exists (7,041 bytes of bytecode)
---
## 📋 Constructor Arguments
The contract was deployed with the following constructor arguments:
1. **CCIP Router**: `0x80226fc0Ee2b096224EeAc085Bb9a8cba1146f7D`
2. **WETH9**: `0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2`
3. **Fee Token (LINK)**: `0x514910771AF9Ca656af840dff83E8264EcF986CA`
**Encoded Constructor Args**:
```
0x00000000000000000000000080226fc0ee2b096224eeac085bb9a8cba1146f7d000000000000000000000000c02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2000000000000000000000000514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
```
---
## ⚠️ Verification Issue
**Error**: `Fail - Unable to verify. Compiled contract deployment bytecode does NOT match the transaction deployment bytecode.`
**Root Cause**: The contract was deployed with `via-ir` enabled, but Etherscan's verification may not support this compiler setting, or the bytecode doesn't match due to:
- Different compiler settings during deployment vs verification
- Source code changes since deployment
- Etherscan's verification system limitations with `via-ir`
---
## 🔧 Verification Command
Use this command to attempt verification:
```bash
cd /home/intlc/projects/smom-dbis-138
source .env
forge verify-contract \
0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2 \
contracts/ccip/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol:CCIPWETH9Bridge \
--chain-id 1 \
--etherscan-api-key "$ETHERSCAN_API_KEY" \
--constructor-args 0x00000000000000000000000080226fc0ee2b096224eeac085bb9a8cba1146f7d000000000000000000000000c02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2000000000000000000000000514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca \
--compiler-version 0.8.20 \
--num-of-optimizations 200 \
--watch
```
---
## 🎯 Next Steps
### Option 1: Manual Verification via Etherscan UI
1. Go to: https://etherscan.io/address/0x89dd12025bfcd38a168455a44b400e913ed33be2#code
2. Click "Contract" tab → "Verify and Publish"
3. Select:
- **Compiler Type**: Solidity (Single file) or Standard JSON Input
- **Compiler Version**: `0.8.20`
- **Open Source License**: MIT
- **Optimization**: Yes (200 runs)
- **Via IR**: Try both with and without
4. Paste the contract source code
5. Enter constructor arguments (ABI-encoded)
6. Submit for verification
### Option 2: Standard JSON Input
If single-file verification fails, use Standard JSON Input:
```bash
cd /home/intlc/projects/smom-dbis-138
forge build --force
# Then use the standard JSON from out/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol/CCIPWETH9Bridge.json
```
### Option 3: Check Deployment Settings
Verify the exact compiler settings used during deployment:
- Check if `via-ir` was actually used
- Verify optimizer runs (200)
- Confirm Solidity version (0.8.20)
---
## 📊 Deployment Information
From broadcast file (`broadcast/DeployCCIPWETH9Bridge.s.sol/1/run-latest.json`):
- **Deployment Transaction**: `0x424b51cac9bf78c59629af93b8bcdabe8fee6235458785da32bec933bac1051d`
- **Block Number**: `0x16afbd0` (23,844,816)
- **Deployer**: `0x4a666f96fc8764181194447a7dfdb7d471b301c8`
- **Gas Used**: `0x1a5c3a` (1,723,450)
**Note**: The broadcast file shows a different contract address (`0x3304b747e565a97ec8ac220b0b6a1f6ffdb837e6`), which suggests this may be a different deployment or the contract at `0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2` was deployed separately.
---
## 🔍 Troubleshooting
1. **Bytecode Mismatch**:
- Ensure source code matches exactly what was deployed
- Check if any imports or dependencies have changed
- Verify compiler settings match deployment
2. **Via-IR Issue**:
- Try verification without `via-ir` flag
- Etherscan may not support `via-ir` verification
- Consider recompiling without `via-ir` for verification
3. **Constructor Arguments**:
- Double-check all addresses are correct
- Ensure proper ABI encoding
---
## ✅ Verification Script
A verification script has been created at:
`/home/intlc/projects/proxmox/scripts/verify-contract-etherscan.sh`
Run it with:
```bash
cd /home/intlc/projects/proxmox
./scripts/verify-contract-etherscan.sh
```
---
**Last Updated**: $(date)
**Status**: ⚠️ **PENDING - BYTECODE MISMATCH**