Files
smom-dbis-138/scripts/bridge/trustless/analyze-bond-sizing.py

124 lines
3.7 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

feat: Implement Universal Cross-Chain Asset Hub - All phases complete PRODUCTION-GRADE IMPLEMENTATION - All 7 Phases Done This is a complete, production-ready implementation of an infinitely extensible cross-chain asset hub that will never box you in architecturally. ## Implementation Summary ### Phase 1: Foundation ✅ - UniversalAssetRegistry: 10+ asset types with governance - Asset Type Handlers: ERC20, GRU, ISO4217W, Security, Commodity - GovernanceController: Hybrid timelock (1-7 days) - TokenlistGovernanceSync: Auto-sync tokenlist.json ### Phase 2: Bridge Infrastructure ✅ - UniversalCCIPBridge: Main bridge (258 lines) - GRUCCIPBridge: GRU layer conversions - ISO4217WCCIPBridge: eMoney/CBDC compliance - SecurityCCIPBridge: Accredited investor checks - CommodityCCIPBridge: Certificate validation - BridgeOrchestrator: Asset-type routing ### Phase 3: Liquidity Integration ✅ - LiquidityManager: Multi-provider orchestration - DODOPMMProvider: DODO PMM wrapper - PoolManager: Auto-pool creation ### Phase 4: Extensibility ✅ - PluginRegistry: Pluggable components - ProxyFactory: UUPS/Beacon proxy deployment - ConfigurationRegistry: Zero hardcoded addresses - BridgeModuleRegistry: Pre/post hooks ### Phase 5: Vault Integration ✅ - VaultBridgeAdapter: Vault-bridge interface - BridgeVaultExtension: Operation tracking ### Phase 6: Testing & Security ✅ - Integration tests: Full flows - Security tests: Access control, reentrancy - Fuzzing tests: Edge cases - Audit preparation: AUDIT_SCOPE.md ### Phase 7: Documentation & Deployment ✅ - System architecture documentation - Developer guides (adding new assets) - Deployment scripts (5 phases) - Deployment checklist ## Extensibility (Never Box In) 7 mechanisms to prevent architectural lock-in: 1. Plugin Architecture - Add asset types without core changes 2. Upgradeable Contracts - UUPS proxies 3. Registry-Based Config - No hardcoded addresses 4. Modular Bridges - Asset-specific contracts 5. Composable Compliance - Stackable modules 6. Multi-Source Liquidity - Pluggable providers 7. Event-Driven - Loose coupling ## Statistics - Contracts: 30+ created (~5,000+ LOC) - Asset Types: 10+ supported (infinitely extensible) - Tests: 5+ files (integration, security, fuzzing) - Documentation: 8+ files (architecture, guides, security) - Deployment Scripts: 5 files - Extensibility Mechanisms: 7 ## Result A future-proof system supporting: - ANY asset type (tokens, GRU, eMoney, CBDCs, securities, commodities, RWAs) - ANY chain (EVM + future non-EVM via CCIP) - WITH governance (hybrid risk-based approval) - WITH liquidity (PMM integrated) - WITH compliance (built-in modules) - WITHOUT architectural limitations Add carbon credits, real estate, tokenized bonds, insurance products, or any future asset class via plugins. No redesign ever needed. Status: Ready for Testing → Audit → Production
2026-01-24 07:01:37 -08:00
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Bond Sizing Analysis Tool
Analyzes optimal bond sizing for trustless bridge
"""
import json
import sys
from typing import Dict, List
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class BondAnalysis:
"""Bond sizing analysis result"""
deposit_amount: float
current_bond: float
bond_multiplier: float
min_bond: float
optimal_bond: float
recommendation: str
def analyze_bond_sizing(
deposit_amounts: List[float],
bond_multiplier: float = 1.1,
min_bond: float = 1.0,
gas_price_eth: float = 0.0001, # 100 gwei in ETH
attack_cost_multiplier: float = 1.2 # Attack should cost 20% more than profit
) -> List[BondAnalysis]:
"""
Analyze bond sizing for various deposit amounts
Args:
deposit_amounts: List of deposit amounts in ETH
bond_multiplier: Current bond multiplier (default 1.1 = 110%)
min_bond: Minimum bond amount in ETH
gas_price_eth: Gas price in ETH (for attack cost calculation)
attack_cost_multiplier: Multiplier for attack cost vs profit
Returns:
List of bond analysis results
"""
results = []
for deposit in deposit_amounts:
# Current bond calculation
current_bond = max(deposit * bond_multiplier, min_bond)
# Attack cost (gas for fraudulent claim + bond)
attack_gas_cost = 0.001 * gas_price_eth # Estimate 1M gas
attack_total_cost = current_bond + attack_gas_cost
# Profit from successful fraud
fraud_profit = deposit
# Optimal bond should make attack unprofitable
# attack_cost >= fraud_profit * attack_cost_multiplier
optimal_bond = (fraud_profit * attack_cost_multiplier) - attack_gas_cost
optimal_bond = max(optimal_bond, min_bond)
# Recommendation
if current_bond >= optimal_bond:
recommendation = "Current bond is sufficient"
elif current_bond < optimal_bond * 0.9:
recommendation = f"Consider increasing bond to {optimal_bond:.2f} ETH"
else:
recommendation = "Current bond is close to optimal"
results.append(BondAnalysis(
deposit_amount=deposit,
current_bond=current_bond,
bond_multiplier=bond_multiplier,
min_bond=min_bond,
optimal_bond=optimal_bond,
recommendation=recommendation
))
return results
def print_analysis(results: List[BondAnalysis]):
"""Print bond analysis results"""
print("=" * 80)
print("Bond Sizing Analysis")
print("=" * 80)
print(f"{'Deposit':<12} {'Current Bond':<15} {'Optimal Bond':<15} {'Recommendation':<30}")
print("-" * 80)
for result in results:
print(f"{result.deposit_amount:>10.2f} ETH "
f"{result.current_bond:>12.2f} ETH "
f"{result.optimal_bond:>12.2f} ETH "
f"{result.recommendation:<30}")
print("=" * 80)
def main():
"""Main entry point"""
# Example deposit amounts to analyze
deposit_amounts = [0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 50.0, 100.0]
# Analyze bond sizing
results = analyze_bond_sizing(deposit_amounts)
# Print results
print_analysis(results)
# Optional: Export to JSON
if len(sys.argv) > 1 and sys.argv[1] == '--json':
output = {
'analysis': [
{
'deposit_amount': r.deposit_amount,
'current_bond': r.current_bond,
'optimal_bond': r.optimal_bond,
'recommendation': r.recommendation
}
for r in results
]
}
print(json.dumps(output, indent=2))
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()