202 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
202 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Security Audit Preparation Guide
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This document provides a comprehensive guide for preparing the trustless bridge system for external security audit.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Audit Package Contents
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 1. Contract Source Code
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Location**: `contracts/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Files**:
|
||
|
|
- `Lockbox138.sol` - Deposit contract on ChainID 138
|
||
|
|
- `InboxETH.sol` - Claim submission on Ethereum
|
||
|
|
- `BondManager.sol` - Bond management
|
||
|
|
- `ChallengeManager.sol` - Fraud proof challenges
|
||
|
|
- `LiquidityPoolETH.sol` - Liquidity pool
|
||
|
|
- `SwapRouter.sol` - DEX integration
|
||
|
|
- `BridgeSwapCoordinator.sol` - Bridge + swap coordination
|
||
|
|
- `libraries/MerkleProofVerifier.sol` - Merkle proof verification
|
||
|
|
- `libraries/FraudProofTypes.sol` - Fraud proof encoding/decoding
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 2. Test Suite
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Location**: `test/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Files**:
|
||
|
|
- `Lockbox138.t.sol` - Lockbox tests
|
||
|
|
- `BondManager.t.sol` - Bond manager tests
|
||
|
|
- `EndToEnd.t.sol` - End-to-end tests
|
||
|
|
- `ForkTests.t.sol` - Fork tests
|
||
|
|
- `FraudProof.t.sol` - Fraud proof tests
|
||
|
|
- `AccessControl.t.sol` - Access control tests
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3. Documentation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Location**: `docs/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Files**:
|
||
|
|
- `ARCHITECTURE.md` - System architecture
|
||
|
|
- `SECURITY.md` - Security model
|
||
|
|
- `FRAUD_PROOFS.md` - Fraud proof documentation
|
||
|
|
- `ACCESS_CONTROL.md` - Access control documentation
|
||
|
|
- `INTEGRATION.md` - Integration guide
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 4. Deployment Scripts
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Location**: `script/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Files**:
|
||
|
|
- `DeployTrustlessBridge.s.sol` - Deployment script
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Audit Scope
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Critical Areas
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Economic Security Model**
|
||
|
|
- Bond sizing calculations
|
||
|
|
- Slashing mechanics
|
||
|
|
- Economic attack scenarios
|
||
|
|
- Profitability analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. **Fraud Proof Implementation**
|
||
|
|
- Merkle proof verification
|
||
|
|
- Fraud proof types
|
||
|
|
- Proof encoding/decoding
|
||
|
|
- Verification logic
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. **Challenge Window**
|
||
|
|
- Timing attacks
|
||
|
|
- Window expiration logic
|
||
|
|
- Finalization conditions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. **Replay Protection**
|
||
|
|
- Deposit ID generation
|
||
|
|
- Nonce management
|
||
|
|
- Double-spend prevention
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5. **Access Control**
|
||
|
|
- Admin functions
|
||
|
|
- Authorization mechanisms
|
||
|
|
- Multisig integration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
6. **Liquidity Pool Security**
|
||
|
|
- Minimum ratio enforcement
|
||
|
|
- Withdrawal restrictions
|
||
|
|
- Fee calculations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
7. **DEX Integration**
|
||
|
|
- Swap execution
|
||
|
|
- Slippage protection
|
||
|
|
- Route validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Pre-Audit Checklist
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Code Quality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] All contracts compile without errors
|
||
|
|
- [ ] All tests pass (215/215)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Code is well-commented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] No known vulnerabilities
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Gas optimization reviewed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Documentation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Architecture documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Security model documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Access control documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Integration guide complete
|
||
|
|
- [ ] API documentation complete
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Testing
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Unit tests comprehensive
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Integration tests complete
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Edge cases covered
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Error conditions tested
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Fuzz tests (if applicable)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Security
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Static analysis completed
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Known issues documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Security assumptions documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Risk assessment complete
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Recommended Audit Firms
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Trail of Bits**
|
||
|
|
- Expertise in DeFi and bridges
|
||
|
|
- Comprehensive audits
|
||
|
|
- Estimated cost: $30k-50k
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. **OpenZeppelin**
|
||
|
|
- Deep Solidity expertise
|
||
|
|
- Bridge experience
|
||
|
|
- Estimated cost: $25k-40k
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. **Consensys Diligence**
|
||
|
|
- Enterprise-grade audits
|
||
|
|
- Bridge specialization
|
||
|
|
- Estimated cost: $40k-60k
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. **CertiK**
|
||
|
|
- Automated + manual review
|
||
|
|
- Good value
|
||
|
|
- Estimated cost: $20k-35k
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Audit Timeline
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Preparation (1-2 weeks)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Prepare audit package
|
||
|
|
2. Select audit firm
|
||
|
|
3. Schedule audit
|
||
|
|
4. Provide access to code/docs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Audit Execution (4-8 weeks)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Initial review
|
||
|
|
2. Detailed analysis
|
||
|
|
3. Issue identification
|
||
|
|
4. Report preparation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Remediation (2-4 weeks)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Review findings
|
||
|
|
2. Prioritize fixes
|
||
|
|
3. Implement fixes
|
||
|
|
4. Re-test
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Final Review (1-2 weeks)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Re-audit critical fixes
|
||
|
|
2. Final report
|
||
|
|
3. Documentation updates
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Post-Audit
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Documentation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Audit report published
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Findings documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Fixes documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Residual risks documented
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Communication
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Public disclosure (if applicable)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] User notification
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Partner notification
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Status updates
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## References
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Contracts: `contracts/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
- Tests: `test/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
- Documentation: `docs/bridge/trustless/`
|
||
|
|
- Security: `docs/bridge/trustless/SECURITY.md`
|
||
|
|
|