Source To CEX Execution Plan

Generated: 2026-04-17T15:11:49Z
Strategy frame: Chain 138 inventory -> canonical bridge -> Mainnet normalization -> CEX handoff
Mainnet funding posture: dual-rail via cWUSDC, cWUSDT

Operator Table

Source Asset	Bridge Output	Preferred Normalization	CEX Deposit Asset	Fallback Path
`cUSDC`	cWUSDC on Ethereum Mainnet	cWUSDC -> USDC	`USDC`	bridge cUSDC -> cWUSDC, then use best available Mainnet USDC normalization route with capped public-pool usage
`cUSDT`	cWUSDT on Ethereum Mainnet	cWUSDT -> cWUSDC -> USDC	`USDC`	use direct cWUSDT -> USDT only for tiny packets or explicit override; otherwise route through USDC normalization
`LP:cUSDT/cUSDC`	cUSDT and cUSDC after LP withdrawal	withdraw LP -> prefer cUSDC feeder -> bridge -> cWUSDC -> USDC	`USDC`	withdraw LP, split outputs by best feeder path, avoid forcing whole ticket through direct USDT sink
`cWUSDC`	none	cWUSDC -> USDC	`USDC`	split size, cap pool usage, treat on-chain conversion strictly as deposit preparation
`cWUSDT`	none	cWUSDT -> cWUSDC -> USDC	`USDC`	direct USDT path is last-resort and tiny; practical size should flow through USDC-normalization

cUSDC is the cleanest same-day corridor feeder.
cUSDT should usually normalize through USDC until direct USDT depth improves.
Stable LP claims are feeder-preparation assets.
Mainnet cWUSDC and cWUSDT are immediate in mechanics, but not deep enough to absorb large tickets on-chain.