- Organized 252 files across project - Root directory: 187 → 2 files (98.9% reduction) - Moved configuration guides to docs/04-configuration/ - Moved troubleshooting guides to docs/09-troubleshooting/ - Moved quick start guides to docs/01-getting-started/ - Moved reports to reports/ directory - Archived temporary files - Generated comprehensive reports and documentation - Created maintenance scripts and guides All files organized according to established standards.
4.5 KiB
Etherscan Verification Status
Date: $(date)
Contract: 0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2
Status: ⚠️ VERIFICATION ATTEMPTED - BYTECODE MISMATCH
✅ Contract Details
- Address:
0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2 - Name:
CCIPWETH9Bridge - Network: Ethereum Mainnet
- Source:
contracts/ccip/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol - Status on Mainnet: ✅ Contract exists (7,041 bytes of bytecode)
📋 Constructor Arguments
The contract was deployed with the following constructor arguments:
- CCIP Router:
0x80226fc0Ee2b096224EeAc085Bb9a8cba1146f7D - WETH9:
0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2 - Fee Token (LINK):
0x514910771AF9Ca656af840dff83E8264EcF986CA
Encoded Constructor Args:
0x00000000000000000000000080226fc0ee2b096224eeac085bb9a8cba1146f7d000000000000000000000000c02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2000000000000000000000000514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
⚠️ Verification Issue
Error: Fail - Unable to verify. Compiled contract deployment bytecode does NOT match the transaction deployment bytecode.
Root Cause: The contract was deployed with via-ir enabled, but Etherscan's verification may not support this compiler setting, or the bytecode doesn't match due to:
- Different compiler settings during deployment vs verification
- Source code changes since deployment
- Etherscan's verification system limitations with
via-ir
🔧 Verification Command
Use this command to attempt verification:
cd /home/intlc/projects/smom-dbis-138
source .env
forge verify-contract \
0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2 \
contracts/ccip/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol:CCIPWETH9Bridge \
--chain-id 1 \
--etherscan-api-key "$ETHERSCAN_API_KEY" \
--constructor-args 0x00000000000000000000000080226fc0ee2b096224eeac085bb9a8cba1146f7d000000000000000000000000c02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2000000000000000000000000514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca \
--compiler-version 0.8.20 \
--num-of-optimizations 200 \
--watch
🎯 Next Steps
Option 1: Manual Verification via Etherscan UI
- Go to: https://etherscan.io/address/0x89dd12025bfcd38a168455a44b400e913ed33be2#code
- Click "Contract" tab → "Verify and Publish"
- Select:
- Compiler Type: Solidity (Single file) or Standard JSON Input
- Compiler Version:
0.8.20 - Open Source License: MIT
- Optimization: Yes (200 runs)
- Via IR: Try both with and without
- Paste the contract source code
- Enter constructor arguments (ABI-encoded)
- Submit for verification
Option 2: Standard JSON Input
If single-file verification fails, use Standard JSON Input:
cd /home/intlc/projects/smom-dbis-138
forge build --force
# Then use the standard JSON from out/CCIPWETH9Bridge.sol/CCIPWETH9Bridge.json
Option 3: Check Deployment Settings
Verify the exact compiler settings used during deployment:
- Check if
via-irwas actually used - Verify optimizer runs (200)
- Confirm Solidity version (0.8.20)
📊 Deployment Information
From broadcast file (broadcast/DeployCCIPWETH9Bridge.s.sol/1/run-latest.json):
- Deployment Transaction:
0x424b51cac9bf78c59629af93b8bcdabe8fee6235458785da32bec933bac1051d - Block Number:
0x16afbd0(23,844,816) - Deployer:
0x4a666f96fc8764181194447a7dfdb7d471b301c8 - Gas Used:
0x1a5c3a(1,723,450)
Note: The broadcast file shows a different contract address (0x3304b747e565a97ec8ac220b0b6a1f6ffdb837e6), which suggests this may be a different deployment or the contract at 0x89dd12025bfCD38A168455A44B400e913ED33BE2 was deployed separately.
🔍 Troubleshooting
-
Bytecode Mismatch:
- Ensure source code matches exactly what was deployed
- Check if any imports or dependencies have changed
- Verify compiler settings match deployment
-
Via-IR Issue:
- Try verification without
via-irflag - Etherscan may not support
via-irverification - Consider recompiling without
via-irfor verification
- Try verification without
-
Constructor Arguments:
- Double-check all addresses are correct
- Ensure proper ABI encoding
✅ Verification Script
A verification script has been created at:
/home/intlc/projects/proxmox/scripts/verify-contract-etherscan.sh
Run it with:
cd /home/intlc/projects/proxmox
./scripts/verify-contract-etherscan.sh
Last Updated: $(date)
Status: ⚠️ PENDING - BYTECODE MISMATCH