Files
mev-searcher-pipeline-refer…/docs/SCALING_AND_REALITY.md
2026-04-12 18:16:20 -07:00

2.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Scaling and competitive reality (reference)

Last Updated: 2026-04-13
Document Version: 1.0
Status: Reference

This compresses “what scales” and “what bites” for teams sizing MEV and arbitrage infrastructure. It is not a revenue forecast.


What scales (qualitatively)

Pattern Scales under competition? Notes
Simple two-pool DEX arb Usually poorly Commoditized; margins often near gas
Triangular / multi-hop Mixed Limited by weakest leg; search cost grows
Backruns (mempool-visible flow) Often better High frequency; outcome dominated by simulation + execution
Sandwiching Mixed (and often excluded by policy) High per-trade upside when it works; protections, reverts, and ethics matter
Liquidations Bursty Large per-event when volatility spikes; protocol-specific
Cross-chain Mixed Capital and bridge latency bound scale
Oracle lag Rare High impact episodes; requires deep protocol knowledge

Top teams typically run a multi-strategy portfolio (detection + simulation + execution shared), rather than a single “arb bot.”


Hard constraints

  1. Near zero-sum extraction against unsophisticated flow or passive LPs: your profit is often someone elses worse execution or lower returns.
  2. Competitors include specialized firms with dedicated data, execution, and builder relationships.
  3. Edge decays as more capital and automation chase the same signals.
  4. Operational risk: reorgs, relay failures, buggy adapters, key compromise, and regulatory attention (especially user-harming strategies).

Detection funnel (intuition)

  • Many raw signals per second (logs, mempool hints, block diffs).
  • Some survive simulation as technically valid.
  • Few remain profitable after gas, tips, and failure probability.
  • Fewer still win the ordering auction against peers.

Framing the system as winning blockspace under uncertainty matches production more closely than “find positive arb.”


Relation to implementation work

Building a reliable internal platform (indexing, deterministic simulation, bundle lifecycle, observability) is valuable even when public mempool alpha is thin: the same components support risk management, internal routing, testing, and incident replay.

For build scope and safety gates, follow MEV_Bot/specs/MVP_SCOPE.md and MEV_Bot/specs/OBSERVABILITY_SAFETY_AND_ROLLOUT.md in the proxmox parent submodule.