Add full monorepo: virtual-banker, backend, frontend, docs, scripts, deployment
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
665
docs/STABLECOIN_AND_TOKEN_RECOMMENDATIONS.md
Normal file
665
docs/STABLECOIN_AND_TOKEN_RECOMMENDATIONS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,665 @@
|
||||
# Stablecoin and Token Recommendations - ChainID 138
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: 2025-12-24
|
||||
**Network**: ChainID 138 (SMOM-DBIS-138)
|
||||
**Status**: Comprehensive recommendations for token deployment
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📋 Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This document provides comprehensive recommendations for deploying stablecoins (USDT, USDC) and other tokens on ChainID 138, including:
|
||||
- Stablecoin deployment strategies
|
||||
- Cross-chain token considerations
|
||||
- Token standards and best practices
|
||||
- Security recommendations
|
||||
- Integration with existing infrastructure
|
||||
- Governance and regulatory considerations
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 💰 Stablecoin Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. USDT (Tether USD)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Deployment Strategy Options
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option A: Native USDT Deployment (Recommended for Independence)
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Full control over token supply and management
|
||||
- No dependency on external bridges
|
||||
- Can implement custom features (pause, blacklist, etc.)
|
||||
- Regulatory compliance features
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Requires trust from users (not backed by Tether Ltd.)
|
||||
- Need to establish liquidity
|
||||
- Regulatory considerations
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// Deploy standard ERC20 USDT contract
|
||||
// Features to include:
|
||||
- Standard ERC20 interface
|
||||
- Pausable functionality
|
||||
- Blacklist/whitelist capability
|
||||
- Multi-signature control
|
||||
- Mint/burn functions (with proper access control)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment Script**: Create `script/DeployUSDT.s.sol`
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Address**: Use CREATE2 for deterministic address
|
||||
- Target: `0xdAC17F958D2ee523a2206206994597C13D831ec7` (Ethereum Mainnet address)
|
||||
- Or: Deploy to new address with proper branding
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial Supply**: 0 (mint on-demand) or 1,000,000 USDT for initial liquidity
|
||||
|
||||
**Decimals**: 6 (standard USDT decimals)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option B: Cross-Chain Wrapped USDT (Recommended for Trust)
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Backed by canonical USDT on Ethereum Mainnet
|
||||
- Users trust the backing
|
||||
- Easier liquidity provision
|
||||
- Regulatory clarity
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Requires bridge infrastructure
|
||||
- Dependency on cross-chain operations
|
||||
- Bridge risk
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// Deploy wrapped USDT contract
|
||||
// Features:
|
||||
- ERC20 interface
|
||||
- Bridge integration (CCIP)
|
||||
- Lock/unlock mechanism
|
||||
- 1:1 backing verification
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment**: Use CCIP bridge pattern similar to WETH9/WETH10
|
||||
|
||||
**Backing**: 1:1 with Ethereum Mainnet USDT (`0xdAC17F958D2ee523a2206206994597C13D831ec7`)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option C: Hybrid Approach (Recommended for Flexibility)
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Native USDT for on-chain operations
|
||||
- Wrapped USDT for cross-chain compatibility
|
||||
- Best of both worlds
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- More complex to manage
|
||||
- Two token addresses to maintain
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
- Deploy native USDT for local use
|
||||
- Deploy wrapped USDT for cross-chain transfers
|
||||
- Provide liquidity for both
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. USDC (USD Coin)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Deployment Strategy Options
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option A: Native USDC Deployment
|
||||
**Similar to USDT Option A**
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Differences:**
|
||||
- Decimals: 6 (standard USDC decimals)
|
||||
- Backing: Should be backed by reserves (if native)
|
||||
- Compliance: Enhanced KYC/AML features if needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Address**: Use CREATE2 or deploy to new address
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial Supply**: 0 or 1,000,000 USDC
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option B: Cross-Chain Wrapped USDC
|
||||
**Similar to USDT Option B**
|
||||
|
||||
**Backing**: 1:1 with Ethereum Mainnet USDC (`0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48`)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
##### Option C: Hybrid Approach
|
||||
**Similar to USDT Option C**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Recommended Stablecoin Deployment Plan
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 1: Wrapped Stablecoins (Quick Start)
|
||||
1. **Deploy Wrapped USDT**
|
||||
- Use CCIP bridge pattern
|
||||
- Backed 1:1 with Ethereum Mainnet USDT
|
||||
- Enable cross-chain transfers
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Deploy Wrapped USDC**
|
||||
- Use CCIP bridge pattern
|
||||
- Backed 1:1 with Ethereum Mainnet USDC
|
||||
- Enable cross-chain transfers
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeline**: 1-2 weeks
|
||||
**Cost**: ~0.02 ETH per token (deployment)
|
||||
**Risk**: Low (backed by canonical tokens)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 2: Native Stablecoins (Long-term)
|
||||
1. **Deploy Native USDT**
|
||||
- Full ERC20 implementation
|
||||
- Pausable, blacklist features
|
||||
- Multi-signature control
|
||||
- Reserve management
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Deploy Native USDC**
|
||||
- Full ERC20 implementation
|
||||
- Enhanced compliance features
|
||||
- Reserve management
|
||||
- Audit before deployment
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeline**: 2-4 weeks (including audit)
|
||||
**Cost**: ~0.02 ETH per token + audit costs
|
||||
**Risk**: Medium (requires trust establishment)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🪙 Other Token Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Governance Token
|
||||
|
||||
#### Purpose
|
||||
- DAO governance
|
||||
- Protocol incentives
|
||||
- Staking rewards
|
||||
- Voting power
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// ERC20 with additional features:
|
||||
- Minting capability (for rewards)
|
||||
- Burn capability (for deflation)
|
||||
- Transfer restrictions (optional, for vesting)
|
||||
- Snapshot integration (for voting)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Name**: DBIS Token or SMOM Token
|
||||
**Recommended Symbol**: DBIS or SMOM
|
||||
**Decimals**: 18
|
||||
**Initial Supply**: 1,000,000,000 tokens (1 billion)
|
||||
**Distribution**:
|
||||
- 40% - Community/DAO treasury
|
||||
- 20% - Team (vested)
|
||||
- 20% - Investors (vested)
|
||||
- 10% - Liquidity provision
|
||||
- 10% - Reserve
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment**: Create `script/DeployGovernanceToken.s.sol`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Liquidity Provider Token (LP Token)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Purpose
|
||||
- Represent liquidity positions
|
||||
- Enable yield farming
|
||||
- Track liquidity provider rewards
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation
|
||||
- Standard ERC20
|
||||
- Minted when liquidity is added
|
||||
- Burned when liquidity is removed
|
||||
- Integrated with DEX (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment**: Part of DEX/AMM deployment (if planned)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Reward Token
|
||||
|
||||
#### Purpose
|
||||
- Staking rewards
|
||||
- Liquidity mining
|
||||
- Protocol incentives
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation
|
||||
- ERC20 with minting capability
|
||||
- Time-locked or rate-limited minting
|
||||
- Integration with staking contracts
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended**: Use governance token for rewards (simpler)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. NFT Tokens (ERC721/ERC1155)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Use Cases
|
||||
- Identity verification
|
||||
- Access tokens
|
||||
- Collectibles
|
||||
- Asset representation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation Options
|
||||
|
||||
##### ERC721 (Non-Fungible Token)
|
||||
- Unique tokens
|
||||
- Individual metadata
|
||||
- Transferable
|
||||
- Use for: Identity, access control, collectibles
|
||||
|
||||
##### ERC1155 (Multi-Token Standard)
|
||||
- Fungible and non-fungible in one contract
|
||||
- Batch operations
|
||||
- Gas efficient
|
||||
- Use for: Asset bundles, game items, multi-type tokens
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment**: Create `script/DeployNFT.s.sol` or `script/DeployMultiToken.s.sol`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Wrapped Native Token (WETH Alternative)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Current Status
|
||||
- ✅ WETH9: Pre-deployed at `0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2`
|
||||
- ✅ WETH10: Pre-deployed at `0xf4BB2e28688e89fCcE3c0580D37d36A7672E8A9f`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Recommendation
|
||||
- **No additional deployment needed** - WETH9 and WETH10 are already available
|
||||
- Consider adding to token lists if not already present
|
||||
- Ensure proper integration with DEX/AMM if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Cross-Chain Tokens
|
||||
|
||||
#### Purpose
|
||||
- Represent assets from other chains
|
||||
- Enable cross-chain DeFi
|
||||
- Bridge tokens
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation
|
||||
- Use CCIP bridge pattern (similar to WETH bridges)
|
||||
- 1:1 backing with source chain tokens
|
||||
- Lock/unlock mechanism
|
||||
- Cross-chain transfer capability
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
- wBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin)
|
||||
- wETH (from other chains)
|
||||
- wMATIC (from Polygon)
|
||||
- wBNB (from BSC)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔒 Security Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Token Contract Security
|
||||
|
||||
#### Essential Features
|
||||
- ✅ Pausable functionality (emergency stop)
|
||||
- ✅ Access control (owner/multi-sig)
|
||||
- ✅ Reentrancy protection
|
||||
- ✅ Integer overflow protection (Solidity 0.8+)
|
||||
- ✅ Blacklist/whitelist (if needed for compliance)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Security Audits
|
||||
- **Required for**: Native stablecoins, governance tokens
|
||||
- **Recommended for**: All tokens with significant value
|
||||
- **Audit Firms**: Consider OpenZeppelin, Trail of Bits, Consensys Diligence
|
||||
|
||||
#### Code Quality
|
||||
- Use OpenZeppelin contracts where possible
|
||||
- Follow best practices (Checks-Effects-Interactions)
|
||||
- Comprehensive test coverage (90%+)
|
||||
- Formal verification for critical functions
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Deployment Security
|
||||
|
||||
#### Multi-Signature Control
|
||||
- Use MultiSig wallet for token contract ownership
|
||||
- Require 3-of-5 or 4-of-7 signatures for critical operations
|
||||
- Separate keys for different functions (mint, pause, upgrade)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Timelock
|
||||
- Implement timelock for critical operations
|
||||
- 24-48 hour delay for minting, pausing, upgrades
|
||||
- Allows community review before execution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Upgradeability
|
||||
- Consider upgradeable proxy pattern for flexibility
|
||||
- Use OpenZeppelin's Upgradeable contracts
|
||||
- Implement upgrade governance
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Operational Security
|
||||
|
||||
#### Key Management
|
||||
- Use hardware wallets for private keys
|
||||
- Implement key rotation procedures
|
||||
- Multi-signature for all critical operations
|
||||
- Secure key storage (HSM, hardware security modules)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Monitoring
|
||||
- Monitor token transfers (large amounts)
|
||||
- Alert on suspicious activity
|
||||
- Track mint/burn operations
|
||||
- Monitor bridge operations (for wrapped tokens)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Token Economics Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Supply Management
|
||||
|
||||
#### Fixed Supply Tokens
|
||||
- Governance tokens
|
||||
- Utility tokens
|
||||
- No minting capability after initial distribution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Variable Supply Tokens
|
||||
- Stablecoins (mint/burn based on demand)
|
||||
- Reward tokens (mint for rewards)
|
||||
- Implement proper controls and limits
|
||||
|
||||
#### Deflationary Tokens
|
||||
- Burn mechanism
|
||||
- Transaction fees burned
|
||||
- Buyback and burn programs
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Distribution Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
#### Fair Launch
|
||||
- No pre-mine
|
||||
- Equal distribution
|
||||
- Community-driven
|
||||
|
||||
#### Gradual Distribution
|
||||
- Vesting schedules
|
||||
- Time-locked releases
|
||||
- Milestone-based releases
|
||||
|
||||
#### Liquidity Provision
|
||||
- Initial liquidity on DEX
|
||||
- Liquidity mining incentives
|
||||
- Stable liquidity pools
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Integration Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. CCIP Bridge Integration
|
||||
|
||||
#### For Wrapped Tokens
|
||||
- Integrate with existing CCIP infrastructure
|
||||
- Use CCIPWETH9Bridge/CCIPWETH10Bridge as reference
|
||||
- Implement lock/unlock mechanism
|
||||
- Enable cross-chain transfers
|
||||
|
||||
#### Bridge Contracts Needed
|
||||
- CCIPUSDTBridge (for wrapped USDT)
|
||||
- CCIPUSDCBridge (for wrapped USDC)
|
||||
- CCIPGovernanceTokenBridge (if needed)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Oracle Integration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Price Feeds
|
||||
- Integrate with existing Oracle Aggregator
|
||||
- Add USDT/USD price feed
|
||||
- Add USDC/USD price feed
|
||||
- Add governance token price feed (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Implementation
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// Add to Oracle Aggregator
|
||||
oracleAggregator.setAggregator(
|
||||
usdtAddress,
|
||||
usdtPriceFeedAddress,
|
||||
deviationThreshold
|
||||
);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Token List Integration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Update Token Lists
|
||||
- Add to `token-lists/lists/dbis-138.tokenlist.json`
|
||||
- Add to `token-list.json`
|
||||
- Include proper metadata:
|
||||
- Name, symbol, decimals
|
||||
- Logo URL
|
||||
- Website, description
|
||||
- Tags (stablecoin, governance, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
#### MetaMask Integration
|
||||
- Ensure tokens appear in MetaMask
|
||||
- Provide proper token metadata
|
||||
- Add to ChainList if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Database Integration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Token Registry
|
||||
- Add tokens to database `tokens` table
|
||||
- Include contract address, symbol, decimals
|
||||
- Track token transfers
|
||||
- Monitor token balances
|
||||
|
||||
#### Migration Script
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
-- Example migration for USDT
|
||||
INSERT INTO tokens (address, symbol, name, decimals, chain_id)
|
||||
VALUES (
|
||||
'0x...', -- USDT address
|
||||
'USDT',
|
||||
'Tether USD',
|
||||
6,
|
||||
138
|
||||
);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📋 Deployment Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Pre-Deployment
|
||||
- [ ] Contract code written and tested
|
||||
- [ ] Security audit completed (for critical tokens)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-signature wallet set up
|
||||
- [ ] Deployment script created
|
||||
- [ ] Gas estimates calculated
|
||||
- [ ] Initial supply/distribution planned
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment
|
||||
- [ ] Deploy contract to testnet (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Verify contract on block explorer
|
||||
- [ ] Test all functions
|
||||
- [ ] Deploy to mainnet (ChainID 138)
|
||||
- [ ] Verify deployment on block explorer
|
||||
- [ ] Update environment variables
|
||||
|
||||
### Post-Deployment
|
||||
- [ ] Add to token lists
|
||||
- [ ] Update database
|
||||
- [ ] Configure oracle price feeds
|
||||
- [ ] Set up monitoring
|
||||
- [ ] Document contract addresses
|
||||
- [ ] Announce deployment
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 💡 Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Contract Design
|
||||
- Use battle-tested libraries (OpenZeppelin)
|
||||
- Follow ERC standards strictly
|
||||
- Implement comprehensive error handling
|
||||
- Use events for all state changes
|
||||
- Document all functions with NatSpec
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Testing
|
||||
- Unit tests for all functions
|
||||
- Integration tests for workflows
|
||||
- Fuzz testing for critical paths
|
||||
- Formal verification for security-critical functions
|
||||
- Test on testnet before mainnet
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Documentation
|
||||
- Clear contract documentation
|
||||
- User guides for token usage
|
||||
- API documentation for integrations
|
||||
- Deployment guides
|
||||
- Security considerations documented
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Governance
|
||||
- Clear tokenomics documentation
|
||||
- Transparent distribution plan
|
||||
- Community involvement in decisions
|
||||
- Regular updates and communication
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Recommended Deployment Priority
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Critical (Weeks 1-2)
|
||||
1. ✅ Wrapped USDT (CCIP bridge)
|
||||
2. ✅ Wrapped USDC (CCIP bridge)
|
||||
3. ✅ Oracle price feeds for USDT/USDC
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Important (Weeks 3-4)
|
||||
4. ✅ Governance token
|
||||
5. ✅ Token list updates
|
||||
6. ✅ Database integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Enhanced (Weeks 5-8)
|
||||
7. ✅ Native USDT (if needed)
|
||||
8. ✅ Native USDC (if needed)
|
||||
9. ✅ Additional cross-chain tokens
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Optional (Future)
|
||||
10. ✅ NFT contracts
|
||||
11. ✅ LP tokens
|
||||
12. ✅ Reward tokens
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Cost Estimates
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment Costs (ChainID 138)
|
||||
- **Wrapped Token Contract**: ~0.01 ETH
|
||||
- **Native Token Contract**: ~0.02 ETH
|
||||
- **Bridge Contract**: ~0.02 ETH
|
||||
- **Oracle Integration**: ~0.005 ETH
|
||||
- **Total (Phase 1)**: ~0.075 ETH
|
||||
|
||||
### Ongoing Costs
|
||||
- **Gas for operations**: Variable
|
||||
- **Oracle updates**: Included in existing infrastructure
|
||||
- **Monitoring**: Included in existing infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔍 Regulatory Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance
|
||||
- **KYC/AML**: Consider for native stablecoins
|
||||
- **Licensing**: Check local regulations
|
||||
- **Reporting**: May need transaction reporting
|
||||
- **Tax**: Consult tax advisor
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommendations
|
||||
- Start with wrapped tokens (lower regulatory risk)
|
||||
- Native tokens may require compliance features
|
||||
- Consider jurisdiction-specific requirements
|
||||
- Document all compliance measures
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📄 Contract Templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard ERC20 Token
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
||||
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
|
||||
|
||||
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
|
||||
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
|
||||
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol";
|
||||
|
||||
contract StandardToken is ERC20, Ownable, Pausable {
|
||||
constructor(
|
||||
string memory name,
|
||||
string memory symbol,
|
||||
uint256 initialSupply
|
||||
) ERC20(name, symbol) {
|
||||
_mint(msg.sender, initialSupply);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function pause() public onlyOwner {
|
||||
_pause();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function unpause() public onlyOwner {
|
||||
_unpause();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function _beforeTokenTransfer(
|
||||
address from,
|
||||
address to,
|
||||
uint256 amount
|
||||
) internal override whenNotPaused {
|
||||
super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, amount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Wrapped Token (CCIP Bridge)
|
||||
```solidity
|
||||
// Similar to CCIPWETH9Bridge pattern
|
||||
// Lock tokens on source chain
|
||||
// Mint on destination chain
|
||||
// 1:1 backing maintained
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Review Recommendations**: Evaluate which options fit your needs
|
||||
2. **Choose Strategy**: Decide on wrapped vs. native vs. hybrid
|
||||
3. **Create Deployment Scripts**: Implement chosen strategy
|
||||
4. **Security Audit**: For critical tokens
|
||||
5. **Deploy**: Follow deployment checklist
|
||||
6. **Integrate**: Update token lists, database, oracles
|
||||
7. **Monitor**: Set up monitoring and alerts
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📚 References
|
||||
|
||||
- ERC20 Standard: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20
|
||||
- OpenZeppelin Contracts: https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts
|
||||
- CCIP Documentation: https://docs.chain.link/ccip
|
||||
- Token List Specification: https://github.com/Uniswap/token-lists
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Last Updated**: 2025-12-24
|
||||
**Status**: Ready for Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user