Better naming for uint256 type functions
This commit is contained in:
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ bool gte128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2);
|
||||
bool gte256(uint256_t *number1, uint256_t *number2);
|
||||
void add128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2, uint128_t *target);
|
||||
void add256(uint256_t *number1, uint256_t *number2, uint256_t *target);
|
||||
void minus128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2, uint128_t *target);
|
||||
void minus256(uint256_t *number1, uint256_t *number2, uint256_t *target);
|
||||
void sub128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2, uint128_t *target);
|
||||
void sub256(uint256_t *number1, uint256_t *number2, uint256_t *target);
|
||||
void or128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2, uint128_t *target);
|
||||
void or256(uint256_t *number1, uint256_t *number2, uint256_t *target);
|
||||
void mul128(uint128_t *number1, uint128_t *number2, uint128_t *target);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user